Estimated annual usage (EAU)
Estimated annual usage (EAU) is the yearly volume a buyer expects to purchase of a part, stated in an RFQ as the basis for pricing. Suppliers quote against EAU: it drives raw material buys, capacity allocation, lot sizing, and tooling amortization. Inflating it buys a better unit price on paper and a repricing fight later, when actual orders arrive at half the stated number.
Examples
Tiered quote: A buyer requests cable assembly pricing at 25,000, 50,000, and 100,000 EAU and receives $11.40, $9.85, and $9.10. Finance models product margin at each tier instead of betting the business case on the most optimistic number, and the supplier sees a buyer who understands how volume drives cost.
Inflation backfires: A startup states 120,000 EAU and wins a $4.05 price. First-year orders total 38,000. The supplier invokes the volume-adjustment clause and reprices to $5.20, and the costed BOM the company showed investors is suddenly off by 28% on that line.
Definition
EAU is not a forecast and not a commitment; it is the volume assumption both sides agree to price against. Suppliers translate it directly into economics: raw material purchase quantities, setup frequency, line allocation, and the per-part share of tooling via amortization. Volume price breaks exist because those costs genuinely fall with quantity, which is also why a fictitious quantity produces a fictitious price.
The honest version costs nothing. State the realistic EAU and request tiered pricing at, say, 25,000, 50,000, and 100,000 units, so the price moves transparently if demand does. A well-structured request for quote makes the EAU, the price breaks, and the commitment terms explicit, and how the RFQ frames volume tends to move the final price more than the negotiation that follows.
When volumes do diverge, contracts handle it better than goodwill: repricing bands tied to actual volume, or periodic true-ups. EAU also feeds the buyer's own order-quantity math and forecasting cycles, so it should trace to a demand plan, not a hope. When buyers run RFQs through LightSource, every supplier prices against the same EAU and tier structure, which keeps the returned quotes comparable line by line.
*GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and COOL VENDORS is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.