Kraljic matrix
The Kraljic matrix is a portfolio analysis tool that categorizes procurement spend into four quadrants based on profit impact and supply risk. It guides differentiated sourcing strategies: leverage, strategic, non-critical, and bottleneck items each require different approaches.
Examples
Portfolio segmentation: A procurement team maps all categories on the matrix. Commodity steel (high spend, many suppliers) falls in "leverage"—suited for competitive bidding. A specialized coating (sole source, critical to performance) falls in "bottleneck"—requiring supply security focus.
Strategy differentiation: Rather than applying one sourcing approach to all categories, the matrix drives distinct strategies: aggressive negotiation for leverage items, partnership development for strategic items, efficiency focus for non-critical items, and supply assurance for bottlenecks.
Category migration planning: The team identifies bottleneck items where supply risk could be reduced through qualification of alternative suppliers, potentially migrating them to the leverage quadrant where competitive pressure can reduce cost.
Definition
The Kraljic matrix (1983) remains one of procurement's most widely used strategic frameworks. Its power lies in simplicity: by plotting categories on two dimensions—profit impact (how much we spend/how critical it is) and supply risk (how difficult it is to source)—it creates four distinct strategy zones.
Leverage items (high impact, low risk) offer the greatest opportunity for cost reduction through competition and volume leverage. Strategic items (high impact, high risk) require deep supplier relationships and joint value creation. Bottleneck items (low impact, high risk) need supply security strategies. Non-critical items (low impact, low risk) should be managed for efficiency.
The framework's value is in driving differentiation. Without it, organizations tend to apply a one-size-fits-all approach—usually competitive bidding—to all categories, which works for leverage items but can damage strategic relationships or ignore supply risks.
Limitations include its static nature (categories can shift over time), the subjectivity of axis placement, and its focus on existing supply markets rather than innovation opportunities. Leading organizations use it as a starting point for strategy development, not as the complete answer.
Previous
Next
*GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and COOL VENDORS is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.