Maverick spend
Maverick spend occurs when employees purchase outside of established contracts, preferred suppliers, or procurement processes. Also called rogue spend or off-contract purchasing, maverick spend bypasses negotiated agreements, reduces expected savings, creates compliance risks, and fragments data visibility. Controlling maverick spend is a persistent challenge for procurement organizations.
Examples
Contract circumvention: Despite a negotiated office supplies contract with 20% discount pricing, employees order from consumer websites at full retail price because it's easier than using the corporate procurement system. The expected contract savings never materialize.
Unauthorized suppliers: A department engages a consulting firm not on the approved vendor list, bypassing standard procurement review. The supplier hasn't been vetted for appropriate qualifications, insurance, or contractual protections.
Payment workarounds: To avoid purchase order requirements, a manager pays an invoice using their corporate credit card for an amount exceeding card policy limits. The spend doesn't appear in procurement systems and avoids appropriate controls.
Definition
Some maverick spend stems from legitimate gaps in procurement coverage: contracts that don't include needed items, approved suppliers that can't meet urgent timelines, or procurement processes too slow for business needs. Understanding why maverick spend occurs helps develop solutions beyond simply demanding compliance.
Other maverick spend results from lack of awareness about existing contracts, user preference for familiar but non-preferred suppliers, or intentional circumvention of controls perceived as bureaucratic obstacles. Each cause requires different responses.
Strategies for reducing maverick spend include making preferred channels easy to use, communicating contract availability and benefits, implementing system controls that enforce compliance, analyzing spend data to identify leakage, and addressing root causes that drive purchasing outside preferred processes.
Complete elimination of maverick spend is often impractical and may not be cost-effective. Instead, organizations focus on reducing maverick spend in high-value categories while accepting some leakage in low-risk areas where enforcement costs exceed benefits.
Frequently asked questions
What is maverick spend in procurement?
Maverick spend is purchasing that happens outside established contracts, preferred suppliers, or procurement processes. Also called rogue spend or off-contract purchasing, maverick spend bypasses negotiated agreements, reduces expected savings, creates compliance risks, and fragments spend data visibility.
Why does maverick spend happen?
Some maverick spend stems from legitimate gaps: contracts that do not cover needed items, approved suppliers that cannot meet urgent timelines, or procurement processes too slow for the business. The rest comes from lack of awareness about existing contracts, preference for familiar suppliers, or intentional circumvention of controls perceived as bureaucratic. Each cause calls for a different response.
How do you reduce maverick spend?
Reducing maverick spend combines making preferred channels easy to use, communicating contract availability and benefits, implementing system controls that enforce compliance, analyzing spend data to identify leakage, and addressing the root causes that push people outside the process. Simply demanding compliance without fixing those causes tends to fail.
Should you try to eliminate maverick spend completely?
Complete elimination of maverick spend is often impractical and may not be cost-effective. Most organizations focus on reducing maverick spend in high-value categories while accepting some leakage in low-risk areas where enforcement costs exceed the benefits.
What does maverick spend look like in practice?
Common maverick spend examples: employees ordering office supplies from consumer websites at full retail despite a contract with 20% discount pricing, a department engaging a consulting firm that never went through vendor vetting, or a manager paying an invoice on a corporate card to dodge purchase order requirements. In each case the spend escapes procurement systems and the controls they enforce.
Previous